Today's Passage
This passage occurs during the fourth year of the Peloponnesian War (428 BCE), focusing on three simultaneous military situations.
Crawley Translation (1910)
About the same time that the Lacedaemonians were at the Isthmus, the Mitylenians marched by land with their mercenaries against Methymna, which they thought to gain by treachery. After assaulting the town, and not meeting with the success that they anticipated, they withdrew to Antissa, Pyrrha, and Eresus; and taking measures for the better security of these towns and strengthening their walls, hastily returned home. After their departure the Methymnians marched against Antissa, but were defeated in a sortie by the Antissians and their mercenaries, and retreated in haste after losing many of their number. Word of this reaching Athens, and the Athenians learning that the Mitylenians were masters of the country and their own soldiers unable to hold them in check, they sent out about the beginning of autumn Paches, son of Epicurus, to take the command, and a thousand Athenian heavy infantry; who worked their own passage and, arriving at Mitylene, built a single wall all round it, forts being erected at some of the strongest points. Mitylene was thus blockaded strictly on both sides, by land and by sea; and winter now drew near.
The Athenians needing money for the siege, although they had for the first time raised a contribution of two hundred talents from their own citizens, now sent out twelve ships to levy subsidies from their allies, with Lysicles and four others in command. After cruising to different places and laying them under contribution, Lysicles went up the country from Myus, in Caria, across the plain of the Meander, as far as the hill of Sandius; and being attacked by the Carians and the people of Anaia, was slain with many of his soldiers.
The same winter the Plataeans, who were still being besieged by the Peloponnesians and Boeotians, distressed by the failure of their provisions, and seeing no hope of relief from Athens, nor any other means of safety, formed a scheme with the Athenians besieged with them for escaping, if possible, by forcing their way over the enemy’s walls; the attempt having been suggested by Theaenetus, son of Tolmides, a soothsayer, and Eupompides, son of Daimachus, one of their generals. At first all were to join: afterwards, half hung back, thinking the risk great; about two hundred and twenty, however, voluntarily persevered in the attempt, which was carried out in the following way. Ladders were made to match the height of the enemy’s wall, which they measured by the layers of bricks, the side turned towards them not being thoroughly whitewashed. These were counted by many persons at once; and though some might miss the right calculation, most would hit upon it, particularly as they counted over and over again, and were no great way from the wall, but could see it easily enough for their purpose. The length required for the ladders was thus obtained, being calculated from the breadth of the brick.
Modern Translation
Around the time when the Spartans were stationed at the Isthmus, the Mytileneans advanced overland with their hired soldiers against Methymna, expecting to capture it through betrayal. However, after attacking the city and failing to achieve the success they had anticipated, they pulled back to Antissa, Pyrrha, and Eresus. There they took steps to improve the defenses of these cities, reinforced their fortifications, and quickly returned home. Following their withdrawal, the Methymnians launched an attack on Antissa, but the defenders of Antissa and their mercenaries defeated them in a counterattack, forcing them to retreat hastily after suffering significant casualties. When news of these events reached Athens, the Athenians learned that the Mytileneans controlled the countryside and that their own forces were unable to contain them. Consequently, around early autumn, they dispatched Paches, son of Epicurus, as commander, along with a thousand Athenian heavy infantry. These soldiers rowed their own ships and, upon reaching Mytilene, constructed a continuous wall encircling the entire city, with fortified positions built at key strategic points. Mytilene was thereby completely blockaded on both land and sea as winter approached.
The Athenians, requiring funds for the siege and having already imposed their first-ever property tax of two hundred talents on their own citizens, now sent twelve ships under the command of Lysicles and four other officers to collect money from their allies. After sailing to various locations and demanding payments, Lysicles traveled inland from Myus in Caria, crossing the Meander plain to reach Sandius hill. There he was ambushed by Carian forces and troops from Anaia, resulting in his death along with many of his men.
That same winter, the Plataeans—still under siege by Peloponnesian and Boeotian forces—were suffering from dwindling supplies. Seeing no prospect of relief from Athens and no other path to safety, they devised a plan with the Athenian soldiers trapped alongside them to attempt an escape by breaking through the enemy's fortifications. This bold scheme was proposed by Theaenetus, son of Tolmides, a religious advisor, and Eupompides, son of Daimachus, one of their commanders. Initially, everyone agreed to participate, but later half withdrew, considering the danger too great. Nevertheless, approximately two hundred and twenty men voluntarily committed to the attempt, which they executed as follows: They constructed ladders to match the height of the enemy wall by counting the layers of bricks on the side facing them, which hadn't been completely plastered over. Multiple people counted simultaneously, and while some might have miscalculated, most arrived at the correct number, especially since they counted repeatedly and were positioned close enough to see the wall clearly for their purposes. They thus determined the necessary ladder length by calculating from the width of the bricks.
Historical Context
This passage occurs during the fourth year of the Peloponnesian War (428 BCE), focusing on three simultaneous military situations. The revolt of Mytilene from Athens has escalated, with the Mytileneans attempting to expand their control over Lesbos but facing setbacks. Athens responds decisively by sending Paches with a force to establish a complete blockade of Mytilene. Meanwhile, Athens faces financial strain from the siege, implementing its first direct tax on citizens and sending expeditions to collect tribute from allies—one of which ends disastrously with Lysicles' death. The third thread involves the desperate Plataeans, Athens' loyal allies, who have been under siege for over two years and are now planning a daring escape attempt using carefully calculated ladders.
Key Themes
Annotations & References
Athenian War Finance
The eisphora (property tax) of 200 talents mentioned here was Athens' first direct tax on citizens, marking a significant shift from relying solely on tribute from allies. This demonstrates the financial strain of prolonged warfare and foreshadows Athens' increasing desperation for resources.
Learn more →Siege Warfare
The Plataean ladder calculation shows sophisticated ancient siege techniques. The methodical counting of brick layers to determine wall height demonstrates the mathematical precision required in ancient warfare, where miscalculation meant certain death.
Learn more →Mytilene Revolt
The Mytilenean revolt (428-427 BCE) was one of the most serious challenges to Athenian imperial control. As oligarchs on Lesbos, the Mytileneans sought Spartan support to break free from Athens, leading to the famous Mytilenean Debate about their punishment.
Learn more →Athenian Empire
Lysicles' tribute-collecting expedition illustrates how Athens maintained its empire through force and financial extraction. His death in Caria shows the risks and resistance Athens faced in maintaining control over distant territories.
Learn more →Parallel Ancient Sources
Diodorus Siculus: Library of History (12.55-56)
Diodorus provides a parallel account of the Mytilene revolt and siege, offering additional details about the political dynamics and the eventual fate of the Mytileneans after their surrender.
Read passage →Plutarch: Life of Nicias (6.1-2)
Plutarch mentions the financial burdens of the war on Athens, including the implementation of direct taxation, providing context for understanding the eisphora mentioned by Thucydides.
Read passage →Xenophon: Hellenica (1.1.1-10)
While dealing with a later period, Xenophon's descriptions of Athenian financial difficulties and tribute collection methods echo the patterns established during the Mytilene crisis.
Read passage →Discussion Questions
- How does the implementation of direct taxation on Athenian citizens reflect the changing nature of the war and its impact on democratic ideals?
- What does the Plataeans' meticulous planning reveal about the relationship between intelligence, courage, and desperation in ancient warfare?
- How do the three simultaneous events in this passage illustrate the multi-front nature of the Peloponnesian War and its strain on all participants?
- What does Lysicles' death while collecting tribute suggest about the stability and sustainability of the Athenian Empire?