Today's Passage
This passage captures Nicias's second speech against the Sicilian Expedition in 415 BCE, delivered in the Athenian Assembly.
Crawley Translation (1910)
“We should also remember that we are but now enjoying some respite from a great pestilence and from war, to the no small benefit of our estates and persons, and that it is right to employ these at home on our own behalf, instead of using them on behalf of these exiles whose interest it is to lie as fairly as they can, who do nothing but talk themselves and leave the danger to others, and who if they succeed will show no proper gratitude, and if they fail will drag down their friends with them. And if there be any man here, overjoyed at being chosen to command, who urges you to make the expedition, merely for ends of his own—specially if he be still too young to command—who seeks to be admired for his stud of horses, but on account of its heavy expenses hopes for some profit from his appointment, do not allow such a one to maintain his private splendour at his country’s risk, but remember that such persons injure the public fortune while they squander their own, and that this is a matter of importance, and not for a young man to decide or hastily to take in hand.
“When I see such persons now sitting here at the side of that same individual and summoned by him, alarm seizes me; and I, in my turn, summon any of the older men that may have such a person sitting next him not to let himself be shamed down, for fear of being thought a coward if he do not vote for war, but, remembering how rarely success is got by wishing and how often by forecast, to leave to them the mad dream of conquest, and as a true lover of his country, now threatened by the greatest danger in its history, to hold up his hand on the other side; to vote that the Siceliots be left in the limits now existing between us, limits of which no one can complain (the Ionian sea for the coasting voyage, and the Sicilian across the open main), to enjoy their own possessions and to settle their own quarrels; that the Egestaeans, for their part, be told to end by themselves with the Selinuntines the war which they began without consulting the Athenians; and that for the future we do not enter into alliance, as we have been used to do, with people whom we must help in their need, and who can never help us in ours.
“And you, Prytanis, if you think it your duty to care for the commonwealth, and if you wish to show yourself a good citizen, put the question to the vote, and take a second time the opinions of the Athenians. If you are afraid to move the question again, consider that a violation of the law cannot carry any prejudice with so many abettors, that you will be the physician of your misguided city, and that the virtue of men in office is briefly this, to do their country as much good as they can, or in any case no harm that they can avoid.”
Modern Translation
We must also bear in mind that we have only recently begun to recover from a devastating plague and from war, with considerable benefit to both our property and our population. It is only right that we should use these resources for ourselves at home, rather than squandering them on these exiles who have every reason to present their case as attractively as possible—men who contribute nothing but words while leaving others to face the actual dangers. If they succeed, they will show no real gratitude; if they fail, they will drag their supporters down with them. And if there is anyone here who is thrilled at being chosen to command and is urging you to undertake this expedition purely for his own purposes—especially if he is still too young to hold command—someone who wants to be admired for his racing stable but hopes to offset its enormous costs through the profits of his position, do not allow such a person to pursue his personal glory at the expense of our city's safety. Remember that such men damage the public good while wasting their private fortunes, and that this matter is too important to be decided by a young man or to be rushed into without careful consideration.
When I see such people now sitting beside that individual, summoned here by him, I am filled with alarm. In response, I call upon any older citizens who may find themselves sitting next to such a person not to be intimidated or shamed into silence, fearing they might be thought cowardly if they don't vote for war. Instead, they should remember how rarely wishful thinking leads to success and how often careful planning does. Let them leave dreams of conquest to these reckless men, and as true patriots—at a time when our country faces perhaps the greatest danger in its history—let them raise their hands in opposition. Vote that the Sicilians should remain within the current boundaries that separate us (boundaries that no one can reasonably dispute: the Ionian Sea for coastal sailing, and the Sicilian Sea for the open crossing), free to manage their own affairs and resolve their own disputes. The Egestaeans, for their part, should be told to finish on their own the war with Selinus that they started without consulting us. And in the future, we should stop forming alliances, as has become our habit, with peoples whom we must assist in their time of need but who can never reciprocate when we need help.
And you, Prytanis, if you believe it is your responsibility to protect our commonwealth, and if you wish to prove yourself a worthy citizen, put this matter to a vote and allow the Athenians to express their opinion once more. If you fear that calling for another vote might be illegal, consider that with so many citizens supporting you, no charge of lawbreaking could stick. You would be acting as the physician to our misguided city. The essence of public service is simply this: to do as much good for your country as possible, or at the very least, to avoid doing it any harm within your power.
Historical Context
This passage captures Nicias's second speech against the Sicilian Expedition in 415 BCE, delivered in the Athenian Assembly. Nicias, an experienced general known for his caution, is attempting to dissuade the Athenians from launching a massive military expedition to Sicily. He specifically targets Alcibiades (without naming him), the young, ambitious aristocrat who championed the expedition. The debate centers on whether Athens should intervene in a conflict between Egesta and Selinus in Sicily. Nicias employs various rhetorical strategies, including appeals to recent suffering from plague and war, warnings about self-interested leadership, and calls for generational wisdom. This moment represents a critical juncture in Athenian history, as the decision to proceed with the expedition would ultimately lead to catastrophic defeat and mark the beginning of Athens's decline in the Peloponnesian War.
Key Themes
Annotations & References
The Great Plague of Athens
The plague struck Athens in 430-426 BCE, killing perhaps a quarter of the population including Pericles. Nicias references this recent catastrophe to argue that Athens needs time to recover its strength rather than embarking on foreign adventures. The plague had devastated both the population and economy of Athens.
Learn more →Alcibiades and Horse Racing
The unnamed young commander with the 'stud of horses' is Alcibiades, who famously entered seven chariots in the Olympic games of 416 BCE. This extravagant display of wealth was both admired and resented. Nicias uses this as evidence of Alcibiades's self-serving motives and financial irresponsibility.
Learn more →The Prytanis
The Prytanis was the presiding officer of the Athenian Assembly, chosen by lot from the 50 members of the tribe currently serving as the standing committee of the Council. Nicias appeals to him to allow a re-vote, suggesting that procedural irregularities would be forgiven if they served the city's best interests.
Learn more →Athenian Democracy and Age
Nicias's appeal to older citizens reflects tensions in Athenian democracy between generations. While the minimum age for most offices was 30, younger citizens could speak in the Assembly. The contrast between youthful ambition and mature wisdom was a recurring theme in Athenian political discourse.
Learn more →Parallel Ancient Sources
Plutarch: Life of Nicias (12-13)
Plutarch provides a biographical perspective on this debate, emphasizing Nicias's caution and Alcibiades's ambition. He notes that Nicias owned property in Thrace's silver mines, making him one of Athens's wealthiest citizens, which adds irony to his criticism of extravagance.
Read passage →Plutarch: Life of Alcibiades (17-18)
Offers Alcibiades's perspective on the Sicilian debate, portraying him as brilliantly persuasive but driven by personal ambition. Plutarch describes how Alcibiades's Olympic victories and lavish lifestyle both impressed and concerned Athenians.
Read passage →Diodorus Siculus: Library of History (12.83-84)
Provides an alternative account of the Sicilian Expedition's origins, with less detail on the Assembly debates but more on the diplomatic background. Diodorus emphasizes the role of the Egestaean ambassadors in deceiving Athens about their resources.
Read passage →Discussion Questions
- How does Nicias use recent traumatic events (plague and war) to make his argument? Is this an effective rhetorical strategy, or could it backfire?
- What assumptions about age, wisdom, and decision-making underlie Nicias's argument? How might these resonate or conflict with modern democratic values?
- Nicias attacks Alcibiades without naming him directly. What are the advantages and risks of this indirect approach in political discourse?
- How does Nicias's call for the Prytanis to allow a re-vote reflect tensions between legal procedure and perceived necessity in democratic decision-making?