Today's Passage
This passage describes two crucial naval engagements in 429 BCE during the Peloponnesian War.
Crawley Translation (1910)
Elated at this incident, the Athenians at one word gave a cheer, and dashed at the enemy, who, embarrassed by his mistakes and the disorder in which he found himself, only stood for an instant, and then fled for Panormus, whence he had put out. The Athenians following on his heels took the six vessels nearest them, and recovered those of their own which had been disabled close inshore and taken in tow at the beginning of the action; they killed some of the crews and took some prisoners. On board the Leucadian which went down off the merchantman, was the Lacedaemonian Timocrates, who killed himself when the ship was sunk, and was cast up in the harbour of Naupactus. The Athenians on their return set up a trophy on the spot from which they had put out and turned the day, and picking up the wrecks and dead that were on their shore, gave back to the enemy their dead under truce. The Peloponnesians also set up a trophy as victors for the defeat inflicted upon the ships they had disabled in shore, and dedicated the vessel which they had taken at Achaean Rhium, side by side with the trophy. After this, apprehensive of the reinforcement expected from Athens, all except the Leucadians sailed into the Crissaean Gulf for Corinth. Not long after their retreat, the twenty Athenian ships, which were to have joined Phormio before the battle, arrived at Naupactus.
Thus the summer ended. Winter was now at hand; but dispersing the fleet, which had retired to Corinth and the Crissaean Gulf, Cnemus, Brasidas, and the other Peloponnesian captains allowed themselves to be persuaded by the Megarians to make an attempt upon Piraeus, the port of Athens, which from her decided superiority at sea had been naturally left unguarded and open. Their plan was as follows: The men were each to take their oar, cushion, and rowlock thong, and, going overland from Corinth to the sea on the Athenian side, to get to Megara as quickly as they could, and launching forty vessels, which happened to be in the docks at Nisaea, to sail at once to Piraeus. There was no fleet on the look-out in the harbour, and no one had the least idea of the enemy attempting a surprise; while an open attack would, it was thought, never be deliberately ventured on, or, if in contemplation, would be speedily known at Athens. Their plan formed, the next step was to put it in execution. Arriving by night and launching the vessels from Nisaea, they sailed, not to Piraeus as they had originally intended, being afraid of the risk, besides which there was some talk of a wind having stopped them, but to the point of Salamis that looks towards Megara; where there was a fort and a squadron of three ships to prevent anything sailing in or out of Megara. This fort they assaulted, and towed off the galleys empty, and surprising the inhabitants began to lay waste the rest of the island.
Modern Translation
Emboldened by this turn of events, the Athenians raised a unified battle cry and charged at the enemy. The Peloponnesians, thrown into confusion by their own tactical errors and the chaos that had overtaken them, held their ground for only a moment before fleeing toward Panormus, their point of departure. The Athenians pursued relentlessly, capturing the six ships closest to them and recovering their own vessels that had been disabled near the shore and taken under tow at the battle's outset. They killed some enemy sailors and captured others. Aboard the Leucadian ship that sank near the merchant vessel was the Spartan officer Timocrates, who took his own life as his ship went down; his body later washed ashore in the harbor of Naupactus. Upon their return, the Athenians erected a trophy at the location from which they had launched their counterattack, then collected the wreckage and bodies along their coastline, returning the enemy dead under a formal truce. The Peloponnesians likewise erected a trophy to commemorate their initial success in disabling the Athenian ships near shore, and consecrated the captured vessel at Achaean Rhium alongside their monument. Following this engagement, fearing the arrival of Athenian reinforcements, the entire Peloponnesian fleet—except for the Leucadians—withdrew into the Crissaean Gulf toward Corinth. Shortly after their departure, the twenty Athenian ships that should have reinforced Phormio before the battle finally reached Naupactus.
Thus concluded the summer campaign. As winter approached, rather than disbanding the fleet that had retreated to Corinth and the Crissaean Gulf, the Peloponnesian commanders Cnemus and Brasidas, along with their fellow officers, were persuaded by the Megarians to attempt a bold strike against Piraeus, Athens' main port. Given Athens' overwhelming naval supremacy, the harbor remained undefended and vulnerable. Their strategy was this: each sailor would carry his oar, seat cushion, and oar-strap overland from Corinth to the Athenian side of the isthmus, proceeding swiftly to Megara. There they would launch forty ships already docked at Nisaea and sail immediately for Piraeus. No Athenian patrol fleet guarded the harbor, as no one imagined the enemy would dare such a surprise attack. A direct assault seemed equally unlikely—surely, they reasoned, Athens would receive advance warning of any such plan. Having devised this scheme, they moved to execute it immediately. Arriving under cover of darkness, they launched the ships from Nisaea but sailed not to Piraeus as originally planned—deterred by the perceived risk and, some claimed, by unfavorable winds—but instead toward the Megarian-facing promontory of Salamis. There stood a fort with three guard ships stationed to blockade Megara's maritime traffic. The Peloponnesians attacked this outpost, captured the empty patrol vessels, caught the local population completely off guard, and began devastating the surrounding territory.
Historical Context
This passage describes two crucial naval engagements in 429 BCE during the Peloponnesian War. First, it concludes the Battle of Naupactus, where the Athenian commander Phormio achieved a remarkable victory despite being outnumbered. The Athenians' superior seamanship allowed them to turn initial defeat into triumph. The second part introduces a daring Peloponnesian plan to attack Athens' undefended port of Piraeus, masterminded by the aggressive Spartan commander Brasidas. This audacious strategy aimed to strike at Athens' greatest strength—her navy—by exploiting her overconfidence. The attempt represents a significant shift in Spartan naval strategy, showing their willingness to adopt unconventional tactics. Though ultimately redirected to Salamis, this operation demonstrated that Athens' maritime dominance could create dangerous blind spots in her defenses.
Key Themes
Annotations & References
Naval Warfare Tactics
The passage illustrates key aspects of ancient naval combat, including the use of ramming tactics, the importance of maintaining formation, and the practice of towing disabled vessels. The Athenian victory showcases their superior seamanship and ability to exploit enemy mistakes in close-quarters naval engagement.
Learn more →Trophy Culture
Both sides erect trophies (tropaia), demonstrating the Greek custom of commemorating battlefield victories. These monuments, typically made from captured arms and armor, served religious and propagandistic purposes, marking the point where the enemy turned to flee and acknowledging divine favor in victory.
Learn more →Brasidas
This passage introduces Brasidas, who would become Sparta's most innovative and successful commander. His willingness to attempt unconventional strategies like the Piraeus raid foreshadowed his later campaigns in Thrace, where he would prove Athens' most dangerous opponent through diplomatic skill and military audacity.
Learn more →Piraeus Harbor
Piraeus served as Athens' primary port and naval base, crucial to her empire and food supply. Its three harbors could accommodate the entire Athenian fleet. The attempted attack reveals both its strategic importance and Athens' dangerous assumption that naval superiority made harbor defenses unnecessary.
Learn more →Parallel Ancient Sources
Diodorus Siculus: Library of History (12.48)
Diodorus provides a parallel account of Phormio's naval victories, emphasizing Athenian naval skill and the psychological impact of these victories on Peloponnesian morale.
Read passage →Plutarch: Life of Pericles (36)
Though Pericles had recently died, Plutarch's account provides context for Athenian naval strategy and the confidence that led to leaving Piraeus undefended.
Read passage →Xenophon: Hellenica (2.1.22-28)
Xenophon describes a later successful surprise attack on Piraeus by Lysander in 404 BCE, showing how the vulnerability exposed in this passage ultimately proved fatal to Athens.
Read passage →Discussion Questions
- How does this passage illustrate the dangers of overconfidence in military superiority? What modern parallels might exist?
- Why did both sides erect trophies despite the ambiguous outcome? What does this tell us about Greek concepts of victory and honor?
- How does Brasidas's willingness to attempt unconventional strategies contrast with typical Spartan military thinking?
- What does the Athenian failure to defend Piraeus reveal about the relationship between strategic assumptions and vulnerability?